I had three hours of history today. One of those hours was a unique class of history in English. For the past two weeks, we have been studying an oil painting be C.R.W. Nevinson (
Among the nerves of the world, to be precise.)
The teacher has been forcing, or at least heavily implying, a certain interpretation of this work, namely the abandonment of past values and the fusion of present and future in the industrial age. All that in a 75.3 x 50 cm space.
I don't see it that way. For me, it's representative of the change of technology in people's lives while they try to hold on to past values (e.g. The church in the background, above all the industrialization). That's just how I interpret it. Nothing wrong with that, it's art. Art is open to interpretation.
She went on to say that during the late 19th century, Britain had an "edge" over the rest of Europe. A blonde kid, probably sixteen, raised his hand and asked what "edge" meant. The teacher then looked at me and asked for a synonym for edge. I offered "advantage." She dismissed that suggestion and decided to go with her own word: power.
Britain had power over Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
That sentence has a lot of implications. She defined power, in this context, as being able to make other countries do what Britain wanted. I tried to explain that saying Britain could make other countries do what they wanted wasn't exactly correct, because they never tried it. At least in Europe. I'm pretty sure I would've known about a British invasion of Europe or a proud European country submitting itself woefully at the boots of all-powerful Britain. They had colonies elsewhere. And colonies weren't really nations.
But she kept pressing the "Britain had all the power then" conclusion, which was a little unnerving. I knew it wasn't really correct. My mind then went to an earlier history class, when the teacher was explaining the same thing: Britain had all the power. He also said that during the early 20th century, all of the U.S. was very very religious. Again, I felt like this wasn't completely true. Robber-barons and the highly industrial North were focused on business more than God. Just look at Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth. That part of the U.S. was all about money. I knew he wasn't completely correct, but I didn't say anything.
So I mulled it over for a while, and came to the following conclusion:
Their history isn't the same as our history. What I'm sitting in class learning is a different interpretation of the socioeconomic situation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
History is like art more than science. It's open to interpretation. What I think happened may not be what Louise thinks happened. It may not be what Isabelle thinks happened. This was pretty troubling to me. I always thought that history was about finding out what really happened by synthesizing different viewpoints of the same event. That's why it was a social science. Now I can see that my understanding of what history is as a subject was wrong. It's so much more personal than a science. I could never convince my teacher that she was wrong. There's too many contradictions and inconsistencies in both our arguments. History is inexact and unbelievably subjective.
Science is about finding the truth. Scientists gather as much data as they can, analyze it, then come to a generally accepted conclusion. But most importantly, if scientists are wrong, they admit it and find the real answer. History lacks that.
The account of what happened, and especially how things were, varies nation by nation. When I'm told a different account of what happened, it completely throws me off. Originally, I felt like I had to find the real, true story, which would involve mind-numbing ammounts of analysis and research. But I really don't have to find out what really happened definitely completely. For me, now, history is just a series of events that people have agreed happened in that particular order.
We think.
From now on, I'll treat history like art. It's my interpretation that matters, and sometimes there really isn't a right answer.
And that's okay.
If you made it this far in my post, congratulations! You made it to the end! I'm so proud of you. Have a complimentary Far Side comic strip.